Best answer: What would happen if the Indian Removal Act never happened?

There would be no United States and the area might have a few small White trading posts, while everything else was still divided between many Native American groups, like Canada, before English conquest of it. Because without that removal, there’s little to no space for white immigration.

Why was the Indian Removal Act important?

To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands.

How was the Indian Removal Act justified?

The Indian Removal Act allowed Jackson to make deals with the Native Americans to get them to move west. In exchange for giving up their land, Indians were promised food, supplies, and money. … The Supreme Court ruled removing the Native Americans by force unconstitutional, but President Jackson ignored them.

Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?

Most white Americans supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country’s economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.

IT\'S FUN:  Question: Is pension from India taxable in USA?

How did the Indian Removal Act Impact America?

While this law enabled the United States to expand their territory and allow U.S. citizens to move further West, this movement of forced relocation angered many Indian tribes who would sometimes resist American forces.

What was a major reason for the Indian Removal Act of 1830?

A major reason for the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was the Supreme Court ruling in 1823 of Johnson v. M’Intosh. In 1823, the court’s ruling that settlers in the South could not purchase lands from the Native Americans because they could not hold title to the lands even though they could occupy and control them.

Why was the Indian Removal Act unfair?

It was not helpful, in fact it was very unfair. This meant the Cherokees had to leave the ancient land, already built and developed lands, schools, and community. And then rebuild all of those man made objects they created. And leaving the ancient land, that they settled on years ago.

Did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?

In 1828, Jackson was elected president. … Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights. But Congress passed the removal law in the spring of 1830.

What did the Indian Removal Act authorized the president to do?

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.

IT\'S FUN:  Can Indians become police in USA?
About India