Why was the Indian Removal Act unfair?
It was not helpful, in fact it was very unfair. This meant the Cherokees had to leave the ancient land, already built and developed lands, schools, and community. And then rebuild all of those man made objects they created. And leaving the ancient land, that they settled on years ago.
How did the Cherokee react to the Indian Removal Act?
From 1817 to 1827, the Cherokees effectively resisted ceding their full territory by creating a new form of tribal government based on the United States government. In response, the Cherokees took legal action to try to save their lands. … In their second Supreme Court case, Worcester v.
Why was the Indian Removal Act illegal and how did it result in the Trail of Tears?
The Cherokee Trail of Tears resulted from the enforcement of the Treaty of New Echota, an agreement signed under the provisions of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which exchanged Indian land in the East for lands west of the Mississippi River, but which was never accepted by the elected tribal leadership or a majority …
How did the Indian Removal Act affect Native American?
Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state. This act affected not only the southeastern nations, but many others further north.
Did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?
In 1828, Jackson was elected president. … Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights. But Congress passed the removal law in the spring of 1830.
What powers did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 gave President Jackson?
Introduction. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.
What actions did the Cherokee take to avoid removal?
Cherokee attempts at resisting the removal by the United States included creating a formal Cherokee constitution, negotiating the Treat of 1819, and proceeding with legal action within the Supreme Court. These actions proved futile when Andrew Jackson was elected President and forcibly removed them for their land.
What Indians resisted the Removal Act?
The Cherokee Nation, led by Principal Chief John Ross, resisted the Indian Removal Act, even in the face of assaults on its sovereign rights by the state of Georgia and violence against Cherokee people.
What were some of the effects of the Indian Removal Act choose the three correct answers?
It expanded slavery to new territories. AND It relocated American Indians to less fertile land. AND It resulted in the deaths of thousands of American Indians.
What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands.
What did Andrew Jackson say about the Indian Removal Act?
Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act?
Several tribes resisted removal, causing conflicts to erupt. Some tribes were forcibly removed, causing distrust for the government. … The Cherokee were forced west along the Trail of Tears years later.