Quick Answer: What argument did the Cherokees make against Indian removal in the 1800s?

What were the arguments for and against the Indian Removal Act?

They felt that building factories, expanding farming, and constructing new roads and railroads would be a better use of the land. These people also believed that the white ways of living were superior to the Native American ways of living. Other people felt it was wrong to remove the Native Americans.

What did the Cherokee do to fight against removal?

The Cherokee government protested the legality of the treaty until 1838, when U.S. president Martin Van Buren ordered the U.S. Army into the Cherokee Nation. The soldiers rounded up as many Cherokees as they could into temporary stockades and subsequently marched the captives, led by John Ross, to the Indian Territory.

How did the Cherokee Nation argue against US Indian removal policies?

The Cherokee Nation argued that U.S. Indian removal policies were illegal because they violated previous treaties and were not made with the official consent of the Cherokee Nation. In addition, the policies violated American ideals, such as respect for other people’s rights.

IT\'S FUN:  Is Metro available from Delhi to Gurgaon?

What was the Cherokee reaction response to Indian Removal?

The Cherokee went to the Supreme Court again in 1831. … It stated that the Cherokee had the right to self-government, and declared Georgia’s extension of state law over them to be unconstitutional. The state of Georgia refused to abide by the Court decision, however, and President Jackson refused to enforce the law.

What were the arguments for the Indian Removal Act?

In the end, those in favor of the Indian Removal Act saw the opportunities for America to increase its territory, political power and influence, and a better economy. Andrew Jackson called for the removal of Indians from American territory, making him a supporter of the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

Why was the Indian Removal Act unnecessary?

Due to the hardship and suffering the Indian Removal Act of 1830 caused Indian peoples, as well as the fact that it was unnecessary, unconstitutional, and immoral, it should not have been passed. … Secondly, the bill violated numerous treaties between the U.S. government and Indian tribes and was thus unconstitutional.

Why did Andrew Jackson remove the Cherokee?

Elected president in 1828, Andrew Jackson supported the removal of American Indians from their homelands, arguing that the American Indians’ survival depended on separation from whites. In this 1835 circular to the Cherokee people, Jackson lays out his case for removal.

What Indians resisted the removal act?

The Cherokee Nation, led by Principal Chief John Ross, resisted the Indian Removal Act, even in the face of assaults on its sovereign rights by the state of Georgia and violence against Cherokee people.

IT\'S FUN:  You asked: Can people from India eat chocolate?

What were some of the effects of the Indian Removal Act choose the three correct answers?

It expanded slavery to new territories. AND It relocated American Indians to less fertile land. AND It resulted in the deaths of thousands of American Indians.

Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act?

Several tribes resisted removal, causing conflicts to erupt. Some tribes were forcibly removed, causing distrust for the government. … The Cherokee were forced west along the Trail of Tears years later.

What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?

Intrusions of land-hungry settlers, treaties with the U.S., and the Indian Removal Act (1830) resulted in the forced removal and migration of many eastern Indian nations to lands west of the Mississippi.

About India