|What Native American groups were affected by the Indian Removal Act?||Choctaw,Creek,Chickasaw,Cherokee,Fox,Sauk,and Seminole|
|Why did government officials want to relocate Native Americans to the west?||to open up more lands for settlement|
Who was affected by the Indian Removal Act?
He encouraged Congress to accept and pass the Removal Act, which gave the President allowance to grant land to the Indian Tribes that agreed to give up their homelands, the biggest tribes affected were the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole.
How did the Indian Removal Act affect Native American?
Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state. This act affected not only the southeastern nations, but many others further north.
What American Indians were affected by the Indian Removal Act of 1830 *?
Under this kind of pressure, Native American tribes—specifically the Creek, Cherokee, Chickasaw, and Choctaw—realized that they could not defeat the Americans in war. The appetite of the settlers for land would not abate, so the Indians adopted a strategy of appeasement.
Which tribe was not affected by the Indian Removal Act?
The Seminoles and other tribes did not leave peacefully, as they resisted the removal along with fugitive slaves. The Second Seminole War lasted from 1835 to 1842 and resulted in the government allowing them to remain in the south Florida swamplands.
What were some possible long term effects of the Indian Removal Act?
3 The Removal and the Development of Slavery
The Southern economy’s reliance on slavery, and increasing Northern opposition to it, would eventually lead to secession of 11 Southern states from the Union, and eventually to the American Civil War.
What was the main reason for the Indian Removal Act?
However, more immediate reasons did cause Congress to pass the Indian Removal Act of 1830 during Jackson’s presidency. The factors contributing to the fate of the Cherokees were the discovery of gold on Cherokee land, the issue of states’ rights, and the emergence of scientific racism.
What was the major provision of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.
What were the arguments for and against the Indian Removal Act?
They felt that building factories, expanding farming, and constructing new roads and railroads would be a better use of the land. These people also believed that the white ways of living were superior to the Native American ways of living. Other people felt it was wrong to remove the Native Americans.
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act? Tribes could choose to remain on their lands. Tribes had no right to any land in the new territories. Tribes had to abide by the decisions of the United States.
Why did Congress pass the Indian Removal Act of 1830 Check all that apply?
The Indian Removal Act was a federal law that President Andrew Jackson promoted. Congress passed the law in 1830. Because Congress wanted to make more land in the Southeast available to white settlers, the law required Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River to move west of it.
What did Andrew Jackson say about the Indian Removal Act?
Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”
How did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?
Jackson warned the tribes that if they failed to move, they would lose their independence and fall under state laws. Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights.